Unfounded foundations, grammatical relativism and Wittgenstein, the educator

This is a critical review of Michael Peters' book, Wittgenstein, Education and the Problem Rationality, in which I focus on following assumptions order to problematize them: Wittgenstein's supposed relativism anti-foundationalism; his status as leading representative analytic philosophy; absence mention Peter’s book publication Wittgenstein’s spelling dictionary 1926, after period he became primary school teacher. The philosopher's preface this dictionary, my view, contains some evidence that may have led him revise main theses Tractatus, giving rise second linguistic turn thinking, concepts "language game", "family resemblances" "following rules" are forged by view grammatical description uses problematic philosophical concepts. argue phase life an educator was intrinsically linked philosopher, intermediate position between dogmatism.